Hi,
On Sun 08 Sep 2013 20:19, Sjoerd van Leent writes:
> Reading the written thoughts below, what was the actual reason no to use
> GNU Lightning? Has that too many complexities or incompatibilities to be
> used for Scheme and other functional languages opposed to it's native
> GNU Smalltalk?
>
Reading the written thoughts below, what was the actual reason no to use
GNU Lightning? Has that too many complexities or incompatibilities to be
used for Scheme and other functional languages opposed to it's native GNU
Smalltalk?
I ask this since recently GNU Lightning 2.0 has seen the light, and
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 13:12 +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a bit too much on our plates ATM to think about native
> compilation. However, "what's the plan" is a common question. So here
> is a tentative plan. Sometime after 2.2 settles down would be the time
> to look at it. It wou
