Re: implicitly using existing function as generic fails in 1.9

2011-05-23 Thread Andy Wingo
On Wed 02 Feb 2011 15:02, Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > Hi, > > See attached code, run using > >./run.scm > > 1.8 says: > > 14:58:59 janneke@vuurvlieg:~/vc/schikkers-list/remove > $ ./run.scm > WARNING: (use): `remove!' imported from both (srfi srfi-1) and (remove) > : remove! >

Re: implicitly using existing function as generic fails in 1.9

2011-02-12 Thread Andy Wingo
On Fri 11 Feb 2011 19:53, Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > I'm attaching the individual files; this works with 1.8.7: Right, I saw your files, and they do work with 1.8.7; I was just trying to figure out what the difference is. I suspect it's merge-generics related. >> I don't understand what's goi

Re: implicitly using existing function as generic fails in 1.9

2011-02-11 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Andy Wingo schreef op vr 11-02-2011 om 18:48 [+0100]: > On Wed 02 Feb 2011 15:02, Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > > > WARNING: (use): `remove!' imported from both (remove) and (srfi srfi-1) > > As far as I can tell, it never worked to merge generics between a > regular procedure and a generic.

Re: implicitly using existing function as generic fails in 1.9

2011-02-11 Thread Andy Wingo
On Wed 02 Feb 2011 15:02, Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > WARNING: (use): `remove!' imported from both (remove) and (srfi srfi-1) As far as I can tell, it never worked to merge generics between a regular procedure and a generic. So the only way that your remove! case could have worked would be