Hi!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> On Wed 08 Feb 2012 14:44, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> What do you think of adding a ‘cancel’ primitive to futures?
>
> It sounds good, but tricky to implement. I'm also not sure it's exactly
> the right interface -- for example, Java seems to have switc
Hi Ludo :)
Picking up some loose ends...
On Wed 08 Feb 2012 14:44, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> What do you think of adding a ‘cancel’ primitive to futures?
It sounds good, but tricky to implement. I'm also not sure it's exactly
the right interface -- for example, Java seems to hav
Hi!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> The web server is single-threaded and uses blocking IO (though it does
> poll(2) for keepalive). As such, any slow writer or slow reader can
> block the process. Using non-blocking I/O is too difficult, for now.
> So, threads.
>
> I'd like to create a pool of threads
On 8 February 2012 05:46, Andy Wingo wrote:
>> I presume the final version will include a type and empty-ness
>> predicate also?
>
> A type predicate, yes. And some other things; see
> wip-threaded-web-server.
>
> Would you find an emptiness predicate useful? It sounds like one of
> those things
On Tue 07 Feb 2012 11:02, Daniel Hartwig writes:
> Note that these verbs conflict with those defined in (ice-9 q) where
> "push" adds elements to the front, not the rear, of the queue.
Hum, indeed. I guess (ice-9 q) is actually a deque...
> I presume the final version will include a type and e
> async-queue-push!
> async-queue-pop! async-queue-try-pop!))
Note that these verbs conflict with those defined in (ice-9 q) where
"push" adds elements to the front, not the rear, of the queue.
This is a very tidy implementation. I presume the final version will
include a
On Mon 06 Feb 2012 23:57, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo skribis:
>
>> I was thinking of adding the following to Guile, to eventually help make
>> the web server a little less terrible. What do you think?
>
> An “asynchronous queue” is a queue of tasks, right?
It's a messag
On Mon 06 Feb 2012 23:09, Mike Gran writes:
> maybe either (ice-9 q) or (ice-9 async-queue) could become a
> generalized version and the other could become a specific version or
> the same codebase.
I forgot to mention the other way: ice-9 q can't be a specific version
of anything else, because
Hi Mike,
On Mon 06 Feb 2012 23:09, Mike Gran writes:
>> From: Andy Wingo
>>Subject: ice-9 async-queue
>>;;; Asynchronous queues
>
> FYI, there is also an (ice-9 q). I haven't really looked
> at it, but, maybe either (ice-9 q) or (ice-9 async-queue)
> could become a generalized version and the
Hi!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> I was thinking of adding the following to Guile, to eventually help make
> the web server a little less terrible. What do you think?
An “asynchronous queue” is a queue of tasks, right?
What kind of tasks would it be: I/O? Computation?
How does it fit with the web s
> From: Andy Wingo
>Subject: ice-9 async-queue
>;;; Asynchronous queues
Hey Andy,
FYI, there is also an (ice-9 q). I haven't really looked
at it, but, maybe either (ice-9 q) or (ice-9 async-queue)
could become a generalized version and the other could
become a specific version or the same code
11 matches
Mail list logo
