Re: compiler.texi: Compiling to the virtual machine

2009-01-19 Thread Ken Raeburn
On Jan 17, 2009, at 18:12, Ludovic Courtès wrote: s/e.g./e.g.,/ To me, s/e.g./for example/ is an idempotent transformation. So if the clause after "e.g." is short, no comma necessary. Otherwise you need a comma for breath. But maybe it is a snooty style. I dunno, I thought the comma was s

Re: compiler.texi: Compiling to the virtual machine

2009-01-17 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hey! Andy Wingo writes: > On Tue 13 Jan 2009 23:45, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> s/toplevel/top-level/ > > Ooh, this one is painful -- I feel like if it changes in the docs it > should change in the code too. Do you really think this is the right > thing? top-level-ref ? ? Cod

Re: compiler.texi: Compiling to the virtual machine

2009-01-15 Thread Andy Wingo
Hi Ludo, Thanks for the review, it's appreciated. I've incorporated your vm.texi changes and will push shortly. On Tue 13 Jan 2009 23:45, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > s/toplevel/top-level/ Ooh, this one is painful -- I feel like if it changes in the docs it should change in the co

Re: compiler.texi: Compiling to the virtual machine

2009-01-13 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! This one also looks very good to me. I would make a few substitutions, but I'm no native speaker so you know better than me: s/toplevel/top-level/ s/runtime/run-time/ s/e.g./e.g.,/ Andy Wingo writes: > @node Extending the Compiler > @subsection Extending the Compiler I like this