Re: call-with-values compilation!

2008-09-18 Thread Neil Jerram
2008/9/17 Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed 17 Sep 2008 21:42, "Neil Jerram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> 2008/9/16 Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> This new instruction, mv-call, takes three byte arguments, and at least >>> two stack arguments. The byte arguments are the number of ar

Re: call-with-values compilation!

2008-09-17 Thread Andy Wingo
On Wed 17 Sep 2008 21:42, "Neil Jerram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2008/9/16 Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> This new instruction, mv-call, takes three byte arguments, and at least >> two stack arguments. The byte arguments are the number of args, and two >> bytes to specify an offset to the

Re: call-with-values compilation!

2008-09-17 Thread Neil Jerram
2008/9/16 Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This new instruction, mv-call, takes three byte arguments, and at least > two stack arguments. The byte arguments are the number of args, and two > bytes to specify an offset to the multiple values return address. The Why _two_bytes to specify an offset?