On Sat 31 Dec 2011 06:54, Daniel Hartwig writes:
> An attempt to summarize the pertinent points of the thread [1].
>
> [1]
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2011-12/msg00241.html
Thanks for doing this! I replied earlier without having read this
thread. Sorry for being a serial pr
11 hours ago, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> On 31 December 2011 15:30, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > But there's one more point that bugs me about the python thing: the
> > resulting list has both the matches and the non-matching gaps, and
> > knowing which is which is tricky. For example, if you do this (I'
On 31 December 2011 15:30, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> But there's one more point that bugs me about the python thing: the
> resulting list has both the matches and the non-matching gaps, and
> knowing which is which is tricky. For example, if you do this (I'll
> use our syntax here, so note the minor
An hour ago, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
>
> Anyway, what do people think of this proposal which tries to address
> that whole discussion:
>
> * [Vanilla `string-split' expanded to support the CHAR_PRED
> semantics of `string-index' et al.]
>
> * New function `string-explode' similar to `string-spli
