Hi Alex,
On Monday, September 13, 2010 04:32:13 am Alex Shinn wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
>
> wrote:
> > I just wanted to share some ideas that come to my mind to churn the
> > prolog into something more useful.
>
> Have you played with schelog and kanren?
Hi,
Alex Shinn writes:
> The default matcher in Racket is extensible by dispatching
> on the first symbol in each list, so a pair is (cons a b) and a
> list would be (list a b c). This is slightly more verbose, and
> looks like how you would generate the data rather than its
> actual structure,
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
wrote:
>
> I just wanted to share some ideas that come to my mind to churn the prolog
> into something more useful.
Have you played with schelog and kanren?
> So I have been trying to rework Shins hygienic version if ice-9 match so that
>
On Fri 10 Sep 2010 10:50, Andy Wingo writes:
> I think this is the right approach (making a separate) :)
"Making a separate module", I mean.
A
--
http://wingolog.org/
Hi Stefan,
No comments on the actual code, but:
On Thu 09 Sep 2010 23:15, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
writes:
> (use-modules (ice-9 match-phd))
I think this is the right approach (making a separate) :) Alex's code is
clean, understandable, and has a historical interface to respect. Your
has lots
