Re: Reference documentation of modules and library

2012-01-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Mike! Mike Gran skribis: > Much of Slib still works.  It does use some removed functions. Good to know. Though if it “uses” removed functions, it doesn’t completely work? :-) > The installation has problems.  Its makefile installs slib into > a directory that Guile doesn't search, and the

Re: Reference documentation of modules and library

2012-01-15 Thread Mike Gran
> From: Ludovic Courtès > Hi Mike, > > I think “Standard Library” should eventually be merged into “Guile > Modules”.    I could try it.  It'll take me a few weeks to geto to it, though. > Regarding standard/extended/3rd-party library, how about adding > second-level sections to sort by theme?

Re: Reference documentation of modules and library

2012-01-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Mike, I think “Standard Library” should eventually be merged into “Guile Modules”. The reason it’s separate currently is that its contents are automatically extracted from the module comments, which is inherited from Guile-Lib. But merging them also means improving their integration with the

Re: Reference documentation of modules and library

2012-01-10 Thread Noah Lavine
I definitely agree that the "Guile Modules" / "Standard Library" distinction doesn't make sense. I never knew why it was that way until I saw this email. It's not so obvious to me how things should be organized, but I think base namespace / modules is a pretty natural distinction. The distinction