Hey Mark,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Does Guile 2.0.11 or current stable-2.0 compile it correctly?
I tested with a 2.0.11 built from source as well as with the stock
Ubuntu 13.10 guile-2.0 package (which is 2.0.9, I think) and they both
compiled it just fine.
Julian Graham writes:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Julian Graham wrote:
>> I think it was compiling for about a minute or two, which was much
>> longer than it took to compile everything else. I'll let it go for a
>> good 30 minutes and send another trace.
>
>
> Okay, this is interesting:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Julian Graham wrote:
> I think it was compiling for about a minute or two, which was much
> longer than it took to compile everything else. I'll let it go for a
> good 30 minutes and send another trace.
Okay, this is interesting: The stack trace is largely the sa
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Interestingly this seems to happen at macro-expansion time. Did you C-c
> your file early, or was this after letting it run for a while?
I think it was compiling for about a minute or two, which was much
longer than it took to compile everyth
On Fri 18 Apr 2014 18:05, Julian Graham writes:
> I was experimenting with building one of my projects using Guile 2.2
> and found that some files just don't seem to want to finish compiling,
> and peg my CPU at 100% -- seems like they might be getting stuck in a
> loop. (Other files compile just
