Re: GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.5-5-gbf8d845

2012-02-02 Thread David Kastrup
Mike Gran writes: >> Thanks for the Unicode 6.1 update!  Now, however: >> >>   FAIL: srfi-14.test: Latin-1 (8-bit charset): char-set:symbol >> >> Would you be willing to investigate? > > Looks like Unicode 6.1 has recategorized some of the symbols, including > a few in Latin-1. >   > "§" U+00A7

Re: GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.5-5-gbf8d845

2012-02-02 Thread Mark H Weaver
Mike Gran writes: >> Thanks for the Unicode 6.1 update!  Now, however: >> >>   FAIL: srfi-14.test: Latin-1 (8-bit charset): char-set:symbol >> >> Would you be willing to investigate? > > Looks like Unicode 6.1 has recategorized some of the symbols, including > a few in Latin-1. >   > "§" U+00A7

Re: GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.5-5-gbf8d845

2012-02-02 Thread Mike Gran
> Hi Mike, > > Thanks for the Unicode 6.1 update!  Now, however: > >   FAIL: srfi-14.test: Latin-1 (8-bit charset): char-set:symbol > > Would you be willing to investigate? Looks like Unicode 6.1 has recategorized some of the symbols, including a few in Latin-1.   "§" U+00A7 SECTION SIGN from S

Re: GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.5-5-gbf8d845

2012-02-02 Thread Mike Gran
Hi Mark-   > Thanks for the Unicode 6.1 update!  Now, however: > >   FAIL: srfi-14.test: Latin-1 (8-bit charset): char-set:symbol > > Would you be willing to investigate? Strange.  I'll check it out today. -Mike

Re: GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.5-5-gbf8d845

2012-02-02 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi Mike, Thanks for the Unicode 6.1 update! Now, however: FAIL: srfi-14.test: Latin-1 (8-bit charset): char-set:symbol Would you be willing to investigate? Many thanks! Mark "Mike Gran" writes: > commit bf8d845468fa71debf45e91a4e40f4b219dab4b0 > Author: Mike Gran > Date: Wed Feb