Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> #ifndef REG_BASIC
> # define GUILE_REG_BASIC 0x1
> #else
> # define GUILE_REG_BASIC REG_BASIC
> #endif
Hmm. Yes, if you're calling scm_make_regexp you need that or
something similar. (To tell it not to force REG_EXTENDED by default.)
"Jason Meade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Is there a standard for regular expressions somewhere?
Posix at
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap09.html
> an affinity for \w
I think in posix [[:word:]] (or whatever the syntax actually is), but
yes other stuff is
Jason Meade wrote:
Is there a standard for regular expressions somewhere?
"a standard"? No. "are standards"? Yes. Many. Naturally,
that is the problem.
It seems like
most implements (from grep through tcl, perl, and beyond) seem to
agree on simple stuff like ^[a-c]?002*[^b]+$ etc... (not
