To clarify I don't want to set the docstring to the value, but to the
**variable name** like elisp, defining the docstring to the value seems insane
to me.
First of all can we agree that the proposed syntax is a good idea that we want
implemented?:
(define variable value docstring)
Le 02/11/2022 à 11:15, Mikael Djurfeldt a écrit :
(define a 5)
(set-object-property! (module-variable (current-module) 'a)
'documentation "The variable a contains a number.")
?
Why not, but I wanted to point out that variable documentation
cannot be done in a way that is consistent with pro
(define a 5)
(set-object-property! (module-variable (current-module) 'a) 'documentation
"The variable a contains a number.")
?
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 9:29 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le 02/11/2022 à 02:08, Jacob Hrbek a écrit :
> > The ability to document variables is critical for many projects
Le 02/11/2022 à 02:08, Jacob Hrbek a écrit :
The ability to document variables is critical for many projects such
as libfive where the variables is used to declares functional computer
aided design structure and other projects where variables influence
the workflow.
Thus proposing to change t
