Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> My impression was that Guile just uses whatever library it finds on
>> the system (if any), and that the library found might or might not be
>> POSIX compliant. If that's correct, then I'd much rather have an
>>
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> - How is the addition of support for Unicode likely to affect any
> regular expression or buffer work?
Oh, I see what you mean. Yes, no doubt a utf-8 aware regexp library
would be needed.
To turn around what I said about glibc, glibc in the righ
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> I would really like to see Guile provide a fixed regular expression
>> format, one that doesn't vary depending on what the build platform has
>> available. Without that, you cannot write scripts that are porta
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I would really like to see Guile provide a fixed regular expression
> format, one that doesn't vary depending on what the build platform has
> available. Without that, you cannot write scripts that are portable,
> at least not with respect to regular ex
"Jason Meade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Under the "Cool Ideas" section of the Guile website, Emacs-like
> buffers are mentioned. I'm thinking this would be a really useful
> library, even independent of Guile. Once such a library is built,
> then extending it into guile shouldn't be too much e
