Hi,
On Thu 28 Jan 2010 22:28, Neil Jerram writes:
> I favour dropping discouraged and only having deprecated.
I'm OK with this as well, FWIW.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
Hi Neil,
Neil Jerram writes:
> If something like uniform-vector-xxx stops being the recommended
> approach, but remains trivial for us to support in the codebase, I think
> it is enough `discouragement' just to remove it from the manual. That
> will make it less likely to be used in new code.
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi Neil,
>
> Neil Jerram writes:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>
>>> That’s what had been done for these functions but libguile also supports
>>> ‘discouraged’ features.
>>
>> I never really saw the case for two levels of deprecation
>> (i.e
Hi Neil,
Neil Jerram writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> That’s what had been done for these functions but libguile also supports
>> ‘discouraged’ features.
>
> I never really saw the case for two levels of deprecation
> (i.e. `discouraged' and `deprecated'). I thought `deprec
Greg Troxel writes:
> Given the history of guile, I suspect that in some number of years a
> feature that has been discouraged will get moved to deprecated, and then
> removed. So the question is really what kind of commitment there is to
> API/ABI stability, and I don't think there is much.
AP
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> That’s what had been done for these functions but libguile also supports
> ‘discouraged’ features.
I never really saw the case for two levels of deprecation
(i.e. `discouraged' and `deprecated'). I thought `deprecated' on its
own was enough.
When depreca
Hi,
Grant Rettke writes:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> What do you think?
>
> You might move said functions to a "deprecated" module.
That’s what had been done for these functions but libguile also supports
‘discouraged’ features.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> What do you think?
You might move said functions to a "deprecated" module.
It is minimal hassle to the user (admittedly more so than what you
explained), self-documenting, and ultimately makes it easier for
everyone because you could set
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I think things like ‘uniform-vector-read’ should be discouraged rather
> than deprecated, since it matches the definition in ‘discouraged.h’:
>
>A discouraged feature is one that shouldn't be used in new code
>since we have a better alternative now
Hej,
On Tue 26 Jan 2010 23:15, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I think things like ‘uniform-vector-read’ should be discouraged rather
> than deprecated, since it matches the definition in ‘discouraged.h’:
>
>A discouraged feature is one that shouldn't be used in new code
>since w
10 matches
Mail list logo
