Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Is it just the compilers that changed,
Seems to be, it's still fine with for instance gcc 2.95 unoptimized.
gcc 4 seems to use up a lot more stack in CEVAL()/DEVAL() when
unoptimized, something like 900 bytes for me, but why that's so I
couldn't tell. (
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 01:31 +0300, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Speaking of which, a -g compile on PPC uses quite a lot of stack -- I
> > had to up the default limit in order to get anything to work (for
> > example, compiling psyntax). That would be an
