Hello,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wonder whether this is a useful benchmark. 1.54 mb is small compared
> to the 2mb L2 cache of a core duo. I think it's best to look
> at tests that exercise a larger working set.
You're right. These are not "GC benchmarks" anyway, but I w
Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
> Hello!
>heap size (MiB) execution time (s.)
> Guile1.54 (1.00x) 6.316 (1.00x)
> BDW-GC, FSD=32.41 (1.57x) 4.943 (0.78x)
I wonder whether this is a useful benchmark. 1.54 mb is small compared
to the 2mb L2 ca
Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
> Hello!
>
> I finally [0] conducted experiments to compare Guile's GC with my port
> of Guile to the Boehm-Demers-Weiser GC (BDW-GC). The code for that port
> is not currently available on-line but I'd be happy to push it somewhere
> (would Guile's repo at Savannah be a
Hi Neil,
"Neil Jerram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 05/11/2008, Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I finally [0] conducted experiments to compare Guile's GC with my port
>> of Guile to the Boehm-Demers-Weiser GC (BDW-GC). The code for that port
>> is not currently available on
On 05/11/2008, Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I finally [0] conducted experiments to compare Guile's GC with my port
> of Guile to the Boehm-Demers-Weiser GC (BDW-GC). The code for that port
> is not currently available on-line but I'd be happy to push it somewhere
> (
