() Ian Price
() Tue, 08 May 2012 03:27:11 +0100
More importantly, I don't want to add a feature no-one will
use, anecdotally, trailers are used rarely if at all, and other
languages feel comfortable leaving it out of their standard
libraries.
Seems a chicken and egg situation; no one
On 6 May 2012 12:52, Ian Price wrote:
> Well, what I meant is a port that would be layered over the top of
> another. Soft ports or custom binary ports would be used to implement
> it. (Is there a reason (effiencywise) to prefer one over the other?)
>
Intuitively I would think custom binary ports
Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
> () Ian Price
> () Sun, 06 May 2012 05:52:00 +0100
>
>I think we can leave trailers until I have some actual data on
>how much these are actually used in practice, and/or someone
>complains about it being missing. WDYT?
>
> It's not so hard to conform. Tra
Hello guilers,
Here is a more complete patch. I've also attached a patch to export
declare-opaque-header!, which I've occasionally found to be useful.
--
Ian Price
"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"
>From
() Ian Price
() Sun, 06 May 2012 05:52:00 +0100
I think we can leave trailers until I have some actual data on
how much these are actually used in practice, and/or someone
complains about it being missing. WDYT?
It's not so hard to conform. Trailers are just headers in the
tail positi
I've attached the patch. It's not ready for inclusion yet, as it needs
more tests, and documentation, but this is the rough idea of what it
will be like. It doesn't close the wrapped port, but I think a keyword
argument might be the right approach.
Thoughts on this, and the patch in general are w
ccing Daniel Hartwig, since he has been a bigger cheerleader for chunked
encoding than I have so far :).
Andy Wingo writes:
> On_Thu 29 Sep 2011 16:09, Ian Price writes:
>
>> If you've used the (web ...) modules, you may have noticed that guile
>> does not currently support chunked-encoding.
S
On Thu 29 Sep 2011 16:09, Ian Price writes:
> If you've used the (web ...) modules, you may have noticed that guile
> does not currently support chunked-encoding. This is expected in a
> HTTP/1.1 world, so I wrote an implementation to cover my immediate
> need, but I'm not particularly convinced
