Re: Branching for 1.8 on 2006-02-05

2006-02-06 Thread Marius Vollmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi, > > Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Also if we don't want to have people hold off on 1.9 only bits in the >> trunk, then I'd say that now qualifies as "as late as possible" ;> > > There has been no 1.7.3, the CVS repository has been r

Re: Branching for 1.8 on 2006-02-05

2006-02-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Also if we don't want to have people hold off on 1.9 only bits in the > trunk, then I'd say that now qualifies as "as late as possible" ;> There has been no 1.7.3, the CVS repository has been relatively quiet since 1.7.2, and applying patches has so

Re: Branching for 1.8 on 2006-02-05

2006-02-05 Thread Rob Browning
Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hehe, it is already very late. :-) > > I really want to get this thing done now, and I don't want to > 'waste' time and try to find the optimal point for branching. I am > in my 'what the heck' mode right now, and maybe I will regret it > later, but wh

Re: Branching for 1.8 on 2006-02-05

2006-02-05 Thread Marius Vollmer
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> (What we have in the 1.8 branch is not immediately the 1.8.0 release, >>> but should be very close.) >> >> Do you really want to branch at all? > > For what it's worth, I'd say there a benefit to branching as l

Re: Branching for 1.8 on 2006-02-05

2006-02-04 Thread Rob Browning
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> (What we have in the 1.8 branch is not immediately the 1.8.0 release, >> but should be very close.) > > Do you really want to branch at all? For what it's worth, I'd say there a benefit to branching as late as possible. If there aren't any items waiting

Re: Branching for 1.8 on 2006-02-05

2006-02-03 Thread Kevin Ryde
Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I want to branch next weekend, on Sunday, 5. Feb. Before that, the > following things should be settled in trunk, There's also an error Non-pair accessed with SCM_C[AD]R: `#< b7a0eae0>' thrown up by goops.test under debug cell acesses. Du

Re: Branching for 1.8 on 2006-02-05

2006-01-29 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, > >I need to kick myself to get going with the 1.8 release, and want to >do it by just branching for 1.8 soon and thus get out of the way of >the devlopment happening on the trunk. > >I want to branch next weekend, on S

Re: Branching for 1.8 on 2006-02-05

2006-01-29 Thread Neil Jerram
Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I need to kick myself to get going with the 1.8 release, and want to > do it by just branching for 1.8 soon and thus get out of the way of > the devlopment happening on the trunk. > > I want to branch next weekend, on Sunday, 5. Feb. Before tha