Re: 2.0.11 on OS X 10.9 / Xcode 5.1

2014-04-24 Thread Mark H Weaver
Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer wrote: > Running numbers.test > ;;; ("#i1@-0" 1.0 -0.0) > FAIL: numbers.test: string->number: valid complex number strings > > The issue seems to be that (imag-part #i1@-0) => 0.0 instead of -0.0, Taylan and I did some more debugging on IRC, and we determined that th

Re: 2.0.11 on OS X 10.9 / Xcode 5.1

2014-04-24 Thread Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer
Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer writes: > The next roadblock I hit is that when I run gdb on the guile > executable, it doesn't seem to realize that the libguile dylib is > loaded, so still lacks the debug symbols from it. (When I enter "info > sharedlibrary" it says "No shared libraries loaded at

Re: 2.0.11 on OS X 10.9 / Xcode 5.1

2014-04-23 Thread Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer
Mark H Weaver writes: > Are you passing any optimization flags? There are some, such as -Ofast, > -ffast-math, -funsafe-math-optimizations, -fno-signed-zeros, > -fassociative-math, and maybe some others that might result in this bug. I don't pass any flags to ./configure or make, other than --p

Re: 2.0.11 on OS X 10.9 / Xcode 5.1

2014-04-22 Thread Mark H Weaver
Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer writes: > Mark H Weaver writes: > >> What does (sin -0.0) evaluate to? >> >> My first guess is that at the C level, sin(-0.0) => 0.0 on your system, >> although IEEE 754 and C11 (F.10.1.6) specify that sin(-0.0) => -0.0. >> >> If my guess is incorrect, then please pu

Re: 2.0.11 on OS X 10.9 / Xcode 5.1

2014-04-22 Thread Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer
Mark H Weaver writes: > What does (sin -0.0) evaluate to? > > My first guess is that at the C level, sin(-0.0) => 0.0 on your system, > although IEEE 754 and C11 (F.10.1.6) specify that sin(-0.0) => -0.0. > > If my guess is incorrect, then please put a breakpoint in > 'scm_c_make_polar' and see w

Re: 2.0.11 on OS X 10.9 / Xcode 5.1

2014-04-10 Thread Mark H Weaver
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes: > By the way, after installing GCC 4.8 from MacPorts and setting the CC > environment variable to use it (executable "gcc-mp-4.8"), the above > issues are resolved, but I get the following test failure now: > > Running numbers.test >

Re: 2.0.11 on OS X 10.9 / Xcode 5.1

2014-04-10 Thread Greg Troxel
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes: > taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes: > >> On OS X 10.9 with Xcode 5.1, make fails unless -O0 is used; the output >> of ./configure && make during the failure is here: >> >> http://sprunge.us/PLGI >> >>

Re: 2.0.11 on OS X 10.9 / Xcode 5.1

2014-04-09 Thread Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes: > taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes: > >> Hi, >> >> On OS X 10.9 with Xcode 5.1, make fails unless -O0 is used; the output >> of ./configure && make during the failure is here: >> >> http://sprunge.us/PL

Re: 2.0.11 on OS X 10.9 / Xcode 5.1

2014-04-09 Thread Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes: > Hi, > > On OS X 10.9 with Xcode 5.1, make fails unless -O0 is used; the output > of ./configure && make during the failure is here: > > http://sprunge.us/PLGI > > After a successful build with -O0, there are two failures during mak