Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I'm assuming that you might have just removed slib.test from SCM_TESTS
> in Makefile.am,
Yep, which keeps it out of the dist, though it still hurts from the
cvs (I dithered about that then did nothing). I guess I could have
commented out everything in
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You could stick those in whenever you're ready. I dropped the
> slib.test because ice-9 slib at the moment bombs with the current
> slib.
How did you drop the test? A run of "make check" still fails here.
I'm assuming that you might have just removed sl
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You could stick those in whenever you're ready. I dropped the
> slib.test because ice-9 slib at the moment bombs with the current
> slib.
OK, sounds good. I'm still in discussions with Aubrey Jaffer. It
looks like the changes in SLIB behavior for 1.8 ma
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> SLIB fixes for 1.8 are still pending.
You could stick those in whenever you're ready. I dropped the
slib.test because ice-9 slib at the moment bombs with the current
slib.
___
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile
Hi,
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please test.
I only ran `make check' and it succeeds on `powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu'.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
___
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel