Hi guys,
It looks like a 3.0.8 might be happening. I am curious to know whether this
(perhaps minus the do form) is considered something that the maintainers of
guile could find interesting.
If subset compatibility of r6|7rs is desired, I could provide a patch for those
files as well so that
Linus Björnstam schreef op do 17-06-2021 om 14:57 [+0200]:
> Guile already does definitions in expression context in
> the bodies of lambda and let-variants. I think this is
> not a big problem since any valid r6rs code is still valid guile.
‘Guile already does definitions in expression context in
Guile already does definitions in expression context in the bodies of lambda
and let-variants. I think this is not a big problem since any valid r6rs code
is still valid guile.
The discussion is in my opinion whether guile's r6rs modules should enforce
this behaviour. That might be a good thing
Linus Björnstam schreef op wo 16-06-2021 om 21:11 [+0200]:
> Hi there!
>
> This patch updates some derived conditional forms (and do and and-let*)
> to support definitions in expression context. Meaning it makes this valid
> code:
>
> (cond
> ((pred? arg)
> (define a (something arg))
>
