Hi
On 2024-10-16 08:44, Rutger van Beusekom wrote:
*Subject:* Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] peg: Add fall-back parsing.
Hi Ekaitz,
> I think this change is not compatible with the PEG syntax. In PEG # is a
> line comment:
I am not attached to # as the PEG expect operator. At the same time the
From: Ekaitz Zarraga
Sent: Monday, 14 October 2024 17:58
To: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen ; guile-devel@gnu.org
Cc: Rutger van Beusekom
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] peg: Add fall-back parsing.
Hi Ekaitz,
> I think this change is not compatible with the PEG syn
On 2024-10-14 09:36, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes:
From: Rutger van Beusekom
This allows production of incomplete parse trees, without errors, e.g.,
for code completion.
* module/ice-9/peg/codegen.scm (%peg:fall-back?): New exported
parameter.
(%enable-expect, %c
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> From: Rutger van Beusekom
>
> This allows production of incomplete parse trees, without errors, e.g.,
> for code completion.
>
> * module/ice-9/peg/codegen.scm (%peg:fall-back?): New exported
> parameter.
> (%enable-expect, %continuation, %final-continuation): New
