On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 6:53 PM Maxime Devos wrote:
> On 30-01-2023 20:56, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué wrote:
> > [...] Maxime found the time to review a quite big PR and added a
> > bunch of useful comments. Reviewing that PR took a lot of effort and I
> > just felt better after fixing all the commen
On 30-01-2023 20:56, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué wrote:
[...] Maxime found the time to review a quite big PR and added a
bunch of useful comments. Reviewing that PR took a lot of effort and I
just felt better after fixing all the comments made. I was even
surprised he (I'm assuming this pronoun) did
On 30-01-2023 01:49, Blake Shaw wrote:
Hi Maxime,
I have to be perfectly up-front: past interactions like this, which
appear to me as more or less a means to gatekeep the contribution
process by tying up others' time in disagreement
It is not.
over what is ultimately
minutiae (I'll get int
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:56 AM Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <
aconchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 4:50 PM Blake Shaw wrote:
>
>>
>> And there's more, its a pattern; I dont know if you troll everyone like
>> this or if I represent something you feel opposed to, but I do know
Hi!
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 4:50 PM Blake Shaw wrote:
>
> And there's more, its a pattern; I dont know if you troll everyone like
> this or if I represent something you feel opposed to, but I do know that it
> was enough for me to become allergic to Guile/Guix community until I
> started hanging
Hi Maxime,
I have to be perfectly up-front: past interactions like this, which appear
to me as more or less a means to gatekeep the contribution process by tying
up others' time in disagreement over what is ultimately minutiae (I'll get
into specifics momentarily), ultimately drove me away from co
On 29-01-2023 04:04, Blake Shaw wrote:
On 26-01-2023 19:57, Blake Shaw wrote:
> @example
> -(match lst
> - (((heads tails ...) ...)
> - heads))
> +(match '(((a b c) e f g) 1 2 3)
> + (((head ...) tails ...)
> + `(,@tails ,head)))
> +@result
On 29-01-2023 03:40, Blake Shaw wrote:
Hi Maxime,
Did you watch my talk from Guix days?
I read the text in the talk, but mostly skipped the speech.
There I detailed that the goal
would be to move from what is painfully obvious, gradually building up
in chunks and peices. That is what is h
Il giorno sab, 28/01/2023 alle 20.10 +0100, randomloo...@riseup.net ha
scritto:
> Il giorno sab, 28/01/2023 alle 14.18 +0100, Maxime Devos ha scritto:
> >
> >
> > > +(define (english-base-ten->number name)
> > > + (match name
> > > + ('zero 0)
> > > + ('one 1)
> > > + ('two 2)
>
Il giorno sab, 28/01/2023 alle 14.18 +0100, Maxime Devos ha scritto:
>
>
> > +(define (english-base-ten->number name)
> > + (match name
> > + ('zero 0)
> > + ('one 1)
> > + ('two 2)
> > + ('three 3)
> > + ('four 4)
> > + ('five 5)
> > + ('six 6)
> > + ('se
On 26-01-2023 19:57, Blake Shaw wrote:
@example
-(match lst
- (((heads tails ...) ...)
- heads))
+(match '(((a b c) e f g) 1 2 3)
+ (((head ...) tails ...)
+ `(,@tails ,head)))
+@result{} (1 2 3 ((a b c) e f g))
@end example
Contrary to the commit message, this isn't an addition of
On 26-01-2023 19:57, Blake Shaw wrote:
+A pattern matcher does precisely what the name implies: it matches
+some arbitrary pattern, and returns some result accordingly.
It doesn't need to return anything -- while functional style is common
in Guile, imperative is still possible. It can retu
12 matches
Mail list logo
