Re: PEG CHanges

2011-05-01 Thread Andy Wingo
Hi, On Sun 01 May 2011 20:13, Noah Lavine writes: > Yes, I think I could do that. Great. > However, I don't think it's quite ready to merge. The last time we > talked about it, I think you wanted to change the s-expression > representation of some of the forms before we made it a public > inte

Re: PEG CHanges

2011-05-01 Thread Noah Lavine
Yes, I think I could do that. However, I don't think it's quite ready to merge. The last time we talked about it, I think you wanted to change the s-expression representation of some of the forms before we made it a public interface. Should that be done before or after the rebase? Noah On Sun, M

Re: PEG CHanges

2011-05-01 Thread Andy Wingo
On Sat 16 Apr 2011 00:04, Noah Lavine writes: > I just pushed some changes to the wip-peg branch. They eliminate the > last remaining circularity in the module imports and then add > everything to the Makefile. It passes all tests on my machine. > > This is my first time pushing something, so I h

PEG CHanges

2011-04-15 Thread Noah Lavine
Hello all, I just pushed some changes to the wip-peg branch. They eliminate the last remaining circularity in the module imports and then add everything to the Makefile. It passes all tests on my machine. This is my first time pushing something, so I hope I did it correctly. If the patches aren't