On Fri 18 Mar 2011 22:16, Noah Lavine writes:
>> The problem is that modules are resolved at compile-time, in addition to
>> run-time, so there just can’t be circular dependencies.
>
> It's true that a module couldn't depend, at compile-time, on a module
> that was only available at run-time. How
Hello,
> The problem is that modules are resolved at compile-time, in addition to
> run-time, so there just can’t be circular dependencies.
It's true that a module couldn't depend, at compile-time, on a module
that was only available at run-time. However, I think we could handle
circular dependen
Hello!
The problem is that modules are resolved at compile-time, in addition to
run-time, so there just can’t be circular dependencies.
Besides, I think it’s generally a problem from an engineering viewpoint
when cycles are introduced.
So my feeling is that Guile should be able to detect cycles
Hello all,
I recently ran up against an issue about modules with circular
dependencies while working on PEG stuff. I reduced it to the following
test case.
Here is file "test-a.scm":
(define-module (test-a)
#:use-module (test-b))
(define-syntax hello
(syntax-rules ()
((hel
