Re: MinGW patches

2014-02-23 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Mark H Weaver > Cc: l...@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 09:21:12 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> We generally rebase before pushing, to keep the git history as linear as > >> reasonably possible. > > > > May I suggest to have this in HACKING, including the

Re: MinGW patches

2014-02-23 Thread Mark H Weaver
Eli Zaretskii writes: >> We generally rebase before pushing, to keep the git history as linear as >> reasonably possible. > > May I suggest to have this in HACKING, including the (probably > necessary) "pull --rebase" that should go with it? Sure, that makes sense. Would you like to propose a p

Re: MinGW patches

2014-02-22 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=disabled > version=3.3.2 > From: Mark H Weaver > Cc: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès), guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 10:59:17 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) > >

Re: MinGW patches

2014-02-22 Thread Mark H Weaver
Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) >> Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:32:34 +0100 >> >> For convenience and to hopefully smooth the process, I’ve added you to >> the Savannah group. Please post here for review before pushing. > > Thanks, but I hav

Re: MinGW patches

2014-02-22 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Neil Jerram > Cc: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès), guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 12:23:26 + > > In case you don't already know: to-be-ignored files can also be added to > .git/info/exclude. In that case the ignoring is part of your own local > metadata, and will useful

Re: MinGW patches

2014-02-22 Thread Neil Jerram
Eli Zaretskii writes: > For my convenience, I prefer to prepare a real ChangeLog entry, then > copy that to a commit message, which leaves a ChangeLog file around. > May I add ChangeLog to libguile/.gitignore, so that ChangeLog is not > flagged by "git status"? In case you don't already know: to

Re: MinGW patches

2014-02-22 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) > Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:32:34 +0100 > > For convenience and to hopefully smooth the process, I’ve added you to > the Savannah group. Please post here for review before pushing. Thanks, but I have one question after reading HACK

Re: MinGW patches

2014-02-22 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) > Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:32:34 +0100 > > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2013-06/msg00037.html > > What about exposing %shell-command-name and %shell-command-switch as you > suggested back then, and using that in

Re: MinGW patches

2014-02-18 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) > Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:32:34 +0100 > > > I don't know if they were, though. One thing I do know is that the > > request to gnulib maintainers to include hstrerror, which I posted, at > > your request, here > > > > http://list

MinGW patches

2014-02-18 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Eli Zaretskii skribis: >> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patc...@sourceware.org, >> guile-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:20:39 +0100 >> >> Doug Evans skribis: >> >> I don’t remember, Eli: do you have patches pending review for these >> issues and o

two more mingw patches: guile runs in wine

2011-01-31 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Hi With these two patches, Guile runs in Wine (the interactive mode still has problems but Schikkers-List runs) and LilyPond also starts to run. I realise that one of these is a pure gnulib thing, you may or may not want to include it until gnulib includes [something like] this. At least, now yo