Hi!
Ian Price skribis:
> Whoops, in my haste, I forgot to note that this _is_ a bug in guile's
> documentation, not in the implementation. Suggested fix included.
Good catch, please push!
> Ludovic, Andy:
> Should I add him to THANKS too?
That’s a good idea in general, yes.
Ludo’.
Hi Ian,
Thanks for the suggestions. I will certainly have a look at those. I
believe the bbtrees can come in handy. Can certainly give it a go.
Sjoerd
On 11/26/2012 11:28 AM, Ian Price wrote:
Sjoerd van Leent Privé writes:
Btw, isn't their a hashtable which is more pure in it's
implementa
Sjoerd van Leent Privé writes:
> Btw, isn't their a hashtable which is more pure in it's
> implementation? The RNRS and SRFI-69 versions are having quite some
> side-effects. I would have expected a method like "hashtable-add"
> which copies an existing hashtable, adds values and returns a new
>
Hi Ian,
The implementation is okay, I wrote a half baked example, as I
understood the bit to be the mutable field. But it should act in
reverse. Got it. In many cases, I use info-lookup-symbol in Guile's
documentation, as it is much easier to navigate than the RNRS website
(which I consider b
Whoops, in my haste, I forgot to note that this _is_ a bug in guile's
documentation, not in the implementation. Suggested fix included.
Ludovic, Andy:
Should I add him to THANKS too?
--
Ian Price -- shift-reset.com
"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity t
Sjoerd van Leent Priv$(D+1(B writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I might have found an issue using commit
> 06906f370f77cbab520ff0d3c47449526934a9c8 (stable-2.0). I am attempting
> to do a hashtable-copy using rnrs hashtables, and set the mutable flag
> to #:t (according to documentation this should make it
Hi all,
I might have found an issue using commit
06906f370f77cbab520ff0d3c47449526934a9c8 (stable-2.0). I am attempting
to do a hashtable-copy using rnrs hashtables, and set the mutable flag
to #:t (according to documentation this should make it immutable, a bit
odd). I attempted #:f as well.
