Stefan Israelsson Tampe writes:
> To note is that in order to implement common lisp one need to bypass tree-il
> and generate directly to glil, the reason is that tagbody is poorly
> represented
> by tree-il. If we intend to be multilingual it would be nice to be able to
> effectively
> represent
Hi,
To note is that in order to implement common lisp one need to bypass tree-il
and generate directly to glil, the reason is that tagbody is poorly
represented
by tree-il. If we intend to be multilingual it would be nice to be able to
effectively
represent those ideoms. Any thoughts on it?
/Stef
Nala Ginrut writes:
>> What about common lisp is scheme a lisp or is CL a scheme :-)
>>
>
> IIRC， someone raised the topic that emerge Clisp into Guile in 2011,
> but what's the status now?
>
>> Anyway to support CL I would think that we need to support placing
>> properties
>> on symbols, e,g.
On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 09:37 -0500, Noah Lavine wrote:
> I sent an email about that, but it was only an idea. I thought it
> would be nice if we could work with the Clisp people. However, I can
> see some barriers to actually doing that, and I don't intend to work
> on it any time soon.
>
Thanks fo
I sent an email about that, but it was only an idea. I thought it would be
nice if we could work with the Clisp people. However, I can see some
barriers to actually doing that, and I don't intend to work on it any time
soon.
Noah
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Nala Ginrut wrote:
> On Wed, 20
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:51 +0100, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
> Hi,
> > In terms of strategy, I think Guile’s focus should remain primarily
> on
> > Scheme variants, and ELisp. Other language front-ends are of course
> > welcome, but we must keep an eye on what the demand is.
>
> What about c
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 14:25 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi!
>
> nalaginrut skribis:
>
> > I switch to lua branch then compiled it and try, seems some bugs there,
> > it can't run successfully:
> > ---cut
> > scheme@(guile-user)> ,L lua
> > Happy hacking wi
Hi,
> In terms of strategy, I think Guile’s focus should remain primarily on
> Scheme variants, and ELisp. Other language front-ends are of course
> welcome, but we must keep an eye on what the demand is.
What about common lisp is scheme a lisp or is CL a scheme :-)
Anyway to support CL I would
Hi!
nalaginrut skribis:
> I switch to lua branch then compiled it and try, seems some bugs there,
> it can't run successfully:
> ---cut
> scheme@(guile-user)> ,L lua
> Happy hacking with Lua! To switch back, type `,L scheme'.
> lua@(guile-user)> x=1
Maybe yo
On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 22:07 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi!
>
> nalaginrut skribis:
>
> > I'd like to know what work should the maintainer take? As I know there's
> > some work has been done, but it didn't merge into stable-2.0. What's the
> > rest work? Does it work now?
>
> I think the f
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 18:04 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi!
>
> nalaginrut skribis:
>
> > @ludo: Thanks! I'll try to do it follow your steps.
> > Besides, do we have the final conclusion for the multi-lang choosing
> > approach, say, --lang=lua/elisp or #
Hi!
nalaginrut skribis:
> @ludo: Thanks! I'll try to do it follow your steps.
> Besides, do we have the final conclusion for the multi-lang choosing
> approach, say, --lang=lua/elisp or #lang lua or a script:
> guile-lua/guile-elisp... whatever. IIRC, ijp raised such a topic,
nalaginrut writes:
> Besides, do we have the final conclusion for the multi-lang choosing
> approach, say, --lang=lua/elisp or #lang lua or a script:
> guile-lua/guile-elisp... whatever. IIRC, ijp raised such a topic, but it
> seems no conclusion.
No, I started compiling a list of t
On 20 November 2012 08:24, Ian Price wrote:
> I'm no expert on lua, so I can't give you a huge long list, but Phil did
> make a post titled "Creating a Lua Roadmap" at
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/12291
>
> The first issues would be them. There appears to be a notes.org in the
> When all this is in place, we can consider merging the branch. I
> wouldn’t want to merge a half-baked front-end.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Ludo’.
>
>
@ijp: thanks for the info ;-)
@ludo: Thanks! I'll try to do it follow your steps.
Besides, do we have the final conclusion for
nalaginrut writes:
> I'm interested on our multi-language feature. And I wish Guile become
> the real dynamic language compiler collection someday, which mean we
> need to add more workable languages.
> I'd like to know what work should the maintainer take? As I know there's
> some work has been
Hi!
nalaginrut skribis:
> I'd like to know what work should the maintainer take? As I know there's
> some work has been done, but it didn't merge into stable-2.0. What's the
> rest work? Does it work now?
I think the first task for you (congratulations! ;-)) or anyone else
interested will be t
On Sat, 2012-11-17 at 16:30 +, Ian Price wrote:
> About two weeks ago, I emailed "Phil", who had shown some interest in
> hacking guile lua a while back. I still haven't heard back from him, nor
> has that branch been touched in 18 months, so I think we can sa
About two weeks ago, I emailed "Phil", who had shown some interest in
hacking guile lua a while back. I still haven't heard back from him, nor
has that branch been touched in 18 months, so I think we can safely say
we need a new maintainer for it.
I have little knowledge of
19 matches
Mail list logo
