Nala Ginrut writes:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I had a quick look at ‘wip-nio’, and here are initial comments.
>>
>> • epoll is Linux-specific. Any idea how a more multi-platform API
>>could be provided? I guess libevent could be used, but
Hi,
Andy Wingo skribis:
> On Wed 21 Mar 2012 23:39, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> I had a quick look at ‘wip-nio’, and here are initial comments.
>
> Thanks for the feedback!
>
>> • epoll is Linux-specific. Any idea how a more multi-platform API
>> could be provided? I gues
On Sun 25 Mar 2012 22:17, Neil Jerram writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> How about, you write your code in such a way that it deals with eports.
>> You could surround your code in a prompt that if an eport operation
>> aborts because it would block, you save the continuation and ask your
>> main
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Thu 22 Mar 2012 22:36, Neil Jerram writes:
>
>> It seems like the module has to anticipate the main loop infrastructure
>> that any using programs will use - which isn't a nice solution.
>
> How about, you write your code in such a way that it deals with eports.
> You cou
On Fri 23 Mar 2012 02:47, Nala Ginrut writes:
> Besides, I think we need "write bytevector from port and return the
> successful size".
That's what (ice-9 nio) from wip-ethreads implements -- the primitives.
It's a little confusing as things have changed some since I first posted
wip-nio. Summ
Heya :)
On Wed 21 Mar 2012 23:39, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I had a quick look at ‘wip-nio’, and here are initial comments.
Thanks for the feedback!
> • epoll is Linux-specific. Any idea how a more multi-platform API
> could be provided? I guess libevent could be used, bu
On Thu 22 Mar 2012 22:36, Neil Jerram writes:
> It seems like the module has to anticipate the main loop infrastructure
> that any using programs will use - which isn't a nice solution.
How about, you write your code in such a way that it deals with eports.
You could surround your code in a prom
Besides, I think we need "write bytevector from port and return the
successful size".
Just like "write-string!/partial". Now I have to use utf8->string to
convert the bytevector to string.
Why we need such a thing? Because once we introduced Non-Block IO ,we can
not write the whole bytevector in on
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Neil Jerram wrote:
> but I would guess that there are cases
> where a module isn't already constrained like this, and still might want
> to use a "do X in N seconds time" function.
>
>
>
I think this "do X in N seconds time" function would be useful. And it's
bette
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi,
>
> Nala Ginrut skribis:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I had a quick look at ‘wip-nio’, and here are initial comments.
>>>
>>> • epoll is Linux-specific. Any idea how a more multi-platform API
>>>
Hi,
Nala Ginrut skribis:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I had a quick look at ‘wip-nio’, and here are initial comments.
>>
>> • epoll is Linux-specific. Any idea how a more multi-platform API
>>could be provided? I guess libevent could be used
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had a quick look at ‘wip-nio’, and here are initial comments.
>
> • epoll is Linux-specific. Any idea how a more multi-platform API
>could be provided? I guess libevent could be used, but we don’t
>want to add one m
Hello,
I had a quick look at ‘wip-nio’, and here are initial comments.
• epoll is Linux-specific. Any idea how a more multi-platform API
could be provided? I guess libevent could be used, but we don’t
want to add one more dependency in 2.0. How much is (ice-9 nio)
dependent on ep
13 matches
Mail list logo
