Hi :)
On Thu 30 Jun 2011 16:17, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I think the compile-time option can be useful when building on a “raw”
> or old system, which doesn’t support all the POSIX bits we wrap, or on a
> slow system.
But we check for all of the bits we do wrap, no? It seems to
Hello!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> I think we should focus on the GNU system, using gnulib to adapt other
> systems to look like GNU. Disabling POSIX bindings helps no one on the
> GNU system -- if the question is one of library size, the solution
> should be loadable modules, not compile-time option
Hi!
A bit late, but...
On Fri 15 Apr 2011 00:17, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Dmitry Dzhus writes:
>
>> Is POSIX module considered optional?
>
> Not really.
>
>> Configuring guile-2.0 and git trunk with --disable-posix results in the
>> following error on my x86:
>
> I pushed a patc
On Sat 02 Apr 2011 17:25, Dmitry Dzhus writes:
> Also similar error when building without dynamic modules support:
>
> CCLD libguile-2.0.la
> CCLD guile
> ./.libs/libguile-2.0.so: undefined reference to `scm_dynamic_link'
> ./.libs/libguile-2.0.so: undefined reference to `scm_dynamic_call
Hi Dmitry,
Dmitry Dzhus writes:
> Is POSIX module considered optional?
Not really.
> Configuring guile-2.0 and git trunk with --disable-posix results in the
> following error on my x86:
I pushed a patch that should allow Guile to be built with
‘--disable-posix’.
However, there’s quite a bit
Also similar error when building without dynamic modules support:
CCLD libguile-2.0.la
CCLD guile
./.libs/libguile-2.0.so: undefined reference to `scm_dynamic_link'
./.libs/libguile-2.0.so: undefined reference to `scm_dynamic_call'
./.libs/libguile-2.0.so: undefined reference to `scm_init_
Is POSIX module considered optional?
Configuring guile-2.0 and git trunk with --disable-posix results in the
following error on my x86:
make all-am
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/sphinx/projects/trunks/guile/libguile'
[... skipped .lo lines ...]
CC libguile_2.0_la-weaks.lo
CC d
