Sorry for very slowly updating. Because I have lot of interesting
ideas to try. ;-)
Now I added "syntax-error" which could catch the error token location
and throw more details.
For a instance:
cut---
sweet@(guile-user)> #c
While readi
I've noticed the mistake of my last mail.
If we make curly-braces a delimiter, it's easier to read infix exp.
And I think we may add an new option to read-options for curly-braces since
there *is* an option for square-brackets.
Considering such a patch for curly-braces could be delay applied. I thi
Thanks Mark! And another question:
I think there isn't an easy way to use Guile inner reader directly.
In simpler case, we can read the exp with it, say:
{2 * 3 - 6}
We may use inner reader to read the exp within {} or [] or ()
But the nested exp is not so easy:
{2 * {3 - 6}}
This CFG is easy to ha
Nala Ginrut writes:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> Guile's reader is of no help at all with source properties.
To clarify, the above quotation was taken out of context. I was only
talking about one particular example, not making a general statement.
>> Fortunately,
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Guile's reader is of no help at all with source properties.
> Fortunately, Guile provides all of the interfaces you need to do this
> job from Scheme: 'set-source-properties!', 'port-filename', 'port-line'
> and 'port-column'. This will have
Sorry for the slow updating. But I think this pretty thing could be written
as leisure.
I added 'nfx', so the complex infix rocks:
{1 + 2 - 5 / 4 * 3 + expt(2 3)} ==> 13/2
Enjoy!
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:42 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Nala Ginrut writes:
>
> > I try to port sweet-expression to newest Guile. Fortunately, the
> > author wrote a compatible version for old Guile in 2008. So I just try
> > to rewrite part of it for some obvious reasons. It woks fine now.
> >
>
Nala Ginrut writes:
> I try to port sweet-expression to newest Guile. Fortunately, the
> author wrote a compatible version for old Guile in 2008. So I just try
> to rewrite part of it for some obvious reasons. It woks fine now.
>
> Though some guys doesn't like sweet-expression at all (OK, they'r
Nala Ginrut writes:
> I try to port sweet-expression to newest Guile. Fortunately, the
> author wrote a compatible version for old Guile in 2008. So I just try
> to rewrite part of it for some obvious reasons. It woks fine now.
>
> Though some guys doesn't like sweet-expression at all (OK, they'r
sorry for stupid typo:
s/Python of C/Python or C
Regards
I try to port sweet-expression to newest Guile. Fortunately, the author
wrote a compatible version for old Guile in 2008. So I just try to rewrite
part of it for some obvious reasons. It woks fine now.
Though some guys doesn't like sweet-expression at all (OK, they're real
Lispers! But me too ;-)).
11 matches
Mail list logo
