These are all good points. Integrating different languages is hard.
Quite frankly, I am not yet sure that sharing a VM would be a good
idea for us, but as we talk more about it it is seeming more and more
reasonable. I sent my original message because I saw that CLisp was
becoming an embeddable li
Hi,
William ML Leslie writes:
> 0. Objects in javascript are maps from string keys to any value. If
> they are to be cast as hashes or dictionaries when passed to a
> language that allows non-string keys, and the language adds a
> non-string key, what happens to the javascript object?
For a si
On 14 April 2011 01:23, Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
> In general, there may be a need for a very good lisp virtual machine to
> run and integrate lisp code in general (CL, various schemes, and other
> sorts of lisp-like languages, we could include perhaps implementations
> of python, ruby, smal
Hello,
> I think we should first compare the virtual machines.
>
>
> If no obvious impossibility is observed, then perhaps modifying the
> compiler of clisp to generate guile VM code would be an easy path to
> obtain a CL implementation running on guile VM. (This would disable the
> interpreter i
Noah Lavine writes:
> Hello Guile and Clisp developers,
>
> I'm writing to talk about vague big-picture ideas, but please bear
> with me for a minute, because I think this could be useful.
>
> I noticed in the recent GNU Summer of Code applications (I'm a mentor
> for Guile) that CLisp wants to b
Hello Guile and Clisp developers,
I'm writing to talk about vague big-picture ideas, but please bear
with me for a minute, because I think this could be useful.
I noticed in the recent GNU Summer of Code applications (I'm a mentor
for Guile) that CLisp wants to become embeddable, and embed into E
