Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I'm assuming that you might have just removed slib.test from SCM_TESTS
> in Makefile.am,
Yep, which keeps it out of the dist, though it still hurts from the
cvs (I dithered about that then did nothing). I guess I could have
commented out everything in
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You could stick those in whenever you're ready. I dropped the
> slib.test because ice-9 slib at the moment bombs with the current
> slib.
How did you drop the test? A run of "make check" still fails here.
I'm assuming that you might have just removed sl
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You could stick those in whenever you're ready. I dropped the
> slib.test because ice-9 slib at the moment bombs with the current
> slib.
OK, sounds good. I'm still in discussions with Aubrey Jaffer. It
looks like the changes in SLIB behavior for 1.8 ma
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> SLIB fixes for 1.8 are still pending.
You could stick those in whenever you're ready. I dropped the
slib.test because ice-9 slib at the moment bombs with the current
slib.
___
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile
Hi,
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please test.
I only ran `make check' and it succeeds on `powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu'.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
___
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
Even though 1.8 is now available, we would like to release 1.6.8 for
those who are still using 1.6 and who may benefit from the accumulated
fixes.
For now the release candidate is available here:
http://people.debian.org/~rlb/tmp/guile-1.6.8-rc1.tar.gz
Please test.
In particular, we are inte
