Hello!
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Sun 27 Mar 2011 15:29, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>
>>> On Sun 13 Mar 2011 16:25, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>>
The problem is that ‘hash-create-handle!’ above created a weak-cdr
pair—i.e., a pair whose c
Hi :)
On Sun 27 Mar 2011 15:29, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> On Sun 13 Mar 2011 16:25, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>
>>> The problem is that ‘hash-create-handle!’ above created a weak-cdr
>>> pair—i.e., a pair whose cdr is /not/ scanned for pointer
Hello!
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Sun 13 Mar 2011 16:25, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> The problem is that ‘hash-create-handle!’ above created a weak-cdr
>> pair—i.e., a pair whose cdr is /not/ scanned for pointers—but ‘set-cdr!’
>> did not register a disappearing link from O to K+V.
On Sun 13 Mar 2011 16:25, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> The problem is that ‘hash-create-handle!’ above created a weak-cdr
> pair—i.e., a pair whose cdr is /not/ scanned for pointers—but ‘set-cdr!’
> did not register a disappearing link from O to K+V. Consequently, O
> eventually gets
Hello,
A bit of explanation for commit
ca33b501a93f8de389c1e3e1bc987f63b6912029...
Try this:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
(use-modules (srfi srfi-1)
(srfi srfi-9))
(define-record-type
(make-foo x)
foo?
(x foo-x))
(define register!
(let
