Daniel Llorens writes:
> On 18 Feb 2015, at 09:08, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> Can you post an updated patch?
>
> sure, against current master.
Looks good to me, please push to master!
Thanks,
Mark
On 18 Feb 2015, at 09:08, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> ...
> Can you post an updated patch?
sure, against current master.
0001-Non-vector-1D-arrays-print-as-1.patch
Description: Binary data
"Llorens, Daniel" writes:
> Some folks are justifiably confused when they can't call vector (or
> bytevector, etc.) routines on 1D arrays that are not vectors (or
> bytevectors, etc.) but print in the same way. This patch fixes this
> issue by making such objects print as #1(...).
Sounds good, b
Some folks are justifiably confused when they can't call vector (or bytevector,
etc.) routines on 1D arrays that are not vectors (or bytevectors, etc.) but
print in the same way. This patch fixes this issue by making such objects print
as #1(...).
The patch is trivial, I'll push to master if n
