Josselin Poiret writes:
> Hi Blake and David,
>
> We were talking about this very node of the documentation yesterday with
> Ludovic and zimoun, so here are my two cents. Rewriting this
> introduction is a very good idea, the current one is pretty hard to get
> into for novices.
>
> David Pirot
Hi Blake and David,
We were talking about this very node of the documentation yesterday with
Ludovic and zimoun, so here are my two cents. Rewriting this
introduction is a very good idea, the current one is pretty hard to get
into for novices.
David Pirotte writes:
> Not at all - and quite anno
Arun Isaac writes:
> Hi Blake,
>
>> Well, these conventions can be found throughout the gamut of scheme
>> literature going back to the 80s, and some of the largest scheme
>> projects, such as Chez, Racket, etc. employ them. So if you're
>> getting into Scheme, you'll necessarily encounter them
Hi Blake,
> Well, these conventions can be found throughout the gamut of scheme
> literature going back to the 80s, and some of the largest scheme
> projects, such as Chez, Racket, etc. employ them. So if you're
> getting into Scheme, you'll necessarily encounter them, and if you
> haven't been
David Pirotte writes:
> Not at all - and quite annoying. imo.
> So i'd 'vote' not to use them anywhere in the guile reference manual
take the following functions in both styles:
(let unwrap ((peel '(unnest arbitrary nestings)))
(match-let* (((core ...)) peel)
((wrappe
> > -
> > style: switch to "Indiana style", bracketing lets and clauses
> > --
> > After spending much time looking at the examples in black & white
> > to edit the texinfo document, it occurred to me just how much the
> > brackets improve legibility.
Not at all - and quite annoying. imo.
So i'd
On 01-02-2023 14:09, Blake Shaw wrote:
[...]
-
style: clean-up newlines
--
It appears that while the PDF needs additional newlines
to be presentable, these appear to have a negative effect
on the presentation of the texinfo doc.
I don't know how to fix this, but from looking at the PDF,
it ap
[V3 update]
@xref{sxml-match} had been commented out because it was interfering
with emacs makeinfo. This ammends that change.
Also adding `--` to breakup changelog into a more digestible format.
Reviewing everything all else, everything appears fine.
[V2 update]
All changes have been squashed i
