Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Bindings to *at functions

2022-10-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Ludovic Courtès skribis: > I erroneously pushed a variant without copyright lines for yourself. If > you confirm that you are the copyright holder, I’ll just readd them as > you had done. Actually no, this is all fine. I guess I just need some rest. :-) Ludo’.

Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Bindings to *at functions

2022-10-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Ludovic Courtès skribis: > Maxime Devos skribis: > >> This is a v2 of >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2021-03/msg0026.html, >> with a lot more tests, a few less functions and more consistent >> documentation. >> ‘rename-file-at’ has been modified to support #f as one of t

Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Bindings to *at functions

2022-06-16 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Maxime, First, apologies for the embarrassingly-long silence… Maxime Devos skribis: > This is a v2 of > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2021-03/msg0026.html, > with a lot more tests, a few less functions and more consistent documentation. > ‘rename-file-at’ has been modified t

[PATCH v2 00/14] Bindings to *at functions

2021-11-16 Thread Maxime Devos
This is a v2 of https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2021-03/msg0026.html, with a lot more tests, a few less functions and more consistent documentation. ‘rename-file-at’ has been modified to support #f as one of the two directory arguments, denoting the current working directory. Maxime