Re: [PATCH 4/5] Inline the effect of am/pre-inst-guile

2011-03-22 Thread Neil Jerram
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: [in rearranged order...] >> -"$(preinstguile)" -l "$(srcdir)/$(snarf_doc).scm" -c " >> \ >> +"$(top_builddir_absolute)/meta/guile" -l "$(srcdir)/$(snarf_doc).scm" >> \ >> + -c "

Re: [PATCH 4/5] Inline the effect of am/pre-inst-guile

2011-03-22 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Neil Jerram schreef op ma 21-03-2011 om 22:19 [+]: > It's just one variable definition, and in my opinion it confuses, > rather than helps, the overall build picture to have two names > (preinstguile and meta/guile) for the same thing. Ah, but in my cross build recipe, i have something like

[PATCH 4/5] Inline the effect of am/pre-inst-guile

2011-03-21 Thread Neil Jerram
It's just one variable definition, and in my opinion it confuses, rather than helps, the overall build picture to have two names (preinstguile and meta/guile) for the same thing. * am/Makefile.am (am_frags): Remove pre-inst-guile. * am/pre-inst-guile: Deleted. * doc/ref/Makefile.am: Don't includ