Hello!
Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis:
> It seems that only re-exporting a (non-macro) variable from an otherwise
> un used module gives a false positive `unused module' warning; it
> doesn't even say `possibly unused module'. Not a big problem, but can
> anything be done about that?
I fixed that a
Hey janneke!
Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> Hello,
>
>> The new ‘-Wunused-module’ warning is enabled at ‘-W2’ only. The main
>> reason for not enabling it at ‘-W1’ is that in the case of modules used
>> at macro-expansion time only, such as (srfi srfi-26), it cannot
>>
Ludovic Courtès writes:
Hello,
> The new ‘-Wunused-module’ warning is enabled at ‘-W2’ only. The main
> reason for not enabling it at ‘-W1’ is that in the case of modules used
> at macro-expansion time only, such as (srfi srfi-26), it cannot
> determine whether a module is definitely unused. In
Hello Guilers!
Following a discussion started at the Guix Days and continued online¹,
it seems we could benefit from a compiler warning for unused modules,
and this is what this patch does.
The new ‘-Wunused-module’ warning is enabled at ‘-W2’ only. The main
reason for not enabling it at ‘-W1’ i
