Re: [PATCH] Allow user-defined meta-commands (take #2)

2010-11-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Andreas Rottmann writes: > Besides allowing user-defined meta-commands, this change also refactors > the meta-command machinery to split reading a command's arguments from > the procedure actually implementing it, and hence allows nesting > meta-commands. As an example of such a command, ",

[PATCH] Allow user-defined meta-commands (take #2)

2010-11-20 Thread Andreas Rottmann
[ Re-sent after rebasing on current HEAD ] Besides allowing user-defined meta-commands, this change also refactors the meta-command machinery to split reading a command's arguments from the procedure actually implementing it, and hence allows nesting meta-commands. As an example of such a comman

Re: [PATCH] Allow user-defined meta-commands

2010-10-31 Thread Jose A. Ortega Ruiz
On Mon, Nov 01 2010, Andreas Rottmann wrote: > Besides allowing user-defined meta-commands, this change also refactors > the meta-command machinery to split reading a command's arguments from > the procedure actually implementing it, and hence allows nesting > meta-commands. As an example of such

[PATCH] Allow user-defined meta-commands

2010-10-31 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Besides allowing user-defined meta-commands, this change also refactors the meta-command machinery to split reading a command's arguments from the procedure actually implementing it, and hence allows nesting meta-commands. As an example of such a command, ",in" is added as a new meta-command. *