Thien-Thi Nguyen:
I think the next big task will be to list and try to reduce
incompatibilities compared to 1.8.
Yes, please.
At the moment, i would ask you to look at the guile-user message
w/ subject "(define ((f a) b) ...)".
I agree about this. IMO it's very elegant, and also
(proba
Ludovic Court?s:
Hello Kjetil,
"Kjetil S. Matheussen" writes:
Guile 1.8.0 segfaults as well.
Here's the code ready for pasting:
(let ((j (lambda () 0))
(k 0))
(do ((i (j) (j))
(l (lambda () 1) (lambda () (+ i 1
((= i 3) k)
(set! k (+
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
A slight modifications makes Guile (the one included
with fedora 11) crash:
[kje...@ttleon bin]$ guile
guile> (let ((j (lambda () 0))
... (k 0))
... (do ((i (j)
... (j))
...(l (lambda ()
...
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:02:38 +0200 (CEST)
From: Kjetil S. Matheussen
To: Bill Schottstaedt
Cc: cmd...@ccrma.stanford.edu, guile-devel-requ...@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [CM] funny scheme code
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Bill Schottstaedt wrote:
For some
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
But it segfaults for me on linux. Gentoo here as well.
Both 1.8.6 and 1.8.4 behave similarly:
kje...@ttleush ~ $ /usr/bin/guile
guile> (use-modules (oop goops))
guile> (define-class () name)
guile> (make )guile> guile> (+ 3
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)":
Hash: SHA1
Michael Burschik wrote:
(use-modules (oop goops))
(define-class ()
name)
(make )
This makes guile 1.8.5 crash with a segmentation fault on Linux. I don't
think it should.
Regards
Michael
Works for me with 1.8.6 on linux.
But it segfaults
Ludovic Court?s:
"Kjetil S. Matheussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The code in question doesn't run on those platforms anyway,
since there's a lot of strict linux stuff.
You are certainly aware that GNU/Linux *is* available on sparc64, alpha,
etc.
Well, ye
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Greg Troxel wrote:
"Kjetil S. Matheussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Also, various types of non-gc pointers are stored in integers in
all of the rt-*.scm files in http://snd.cvs.sourceforge.net/snd/cvs-snd/
and many others (xg.c, etc.). It would be hor
Ludovic Court?s:
Well, `configure.in' has an `AC_PREREQ' call, 1.10(.1) is the latest
Automake, and 1.5.26 is the latest Libtool of the 1.x series, it's
easy.
Thanks, I didn't know that.
No. `configure' checks the size of a number of (integer) types. The
idea here would be to have a chec
Ludovic Court?s:
>> I gave it a try. Unfortunately, I was completely unable to create
>> the configure file right now, so the patch is against 1.8.5 (sorry
>> if this creats trouble against git repository), and
>> it's also untested, since I couldn't build configure.
>
>You have to make sure you a
Ludovic Courtès:
>> kjetil ttleush ~/guile-1.8.5 $ gcc -Iinclude/ -Llib lib/libguile.a
>> test.c
> > /tmp/ccMcEAxd.o: In function `main':
> > test.c:(.text+0x1b): undefined reference to `scm_from_uintptr'
> > test.c:(.text+0x2c): undefined reference to `scm_to_uintptr'
> > collect2: ld returned
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
>
> Ludovic Court?s:
> > scenes.
> >
> > > I agree with Maciek that it would at least be mind-comforting to have
> > > functions like scm_to_ptr/etc, although not strictly necessary,
> > > since usin
Ludovic Court?s:
> scenes.
>
> > I agree with Maciek that it would at least be mind-comforting to have
> > functions like scm_to_ptr/etc, although not strictly necessary,
> > since using integers works just fine.
>
> `scm_{to,from}_uintptr ()' could be handy (patches welcome!).
>
I gave it a t
Clinton Ebadi;
Clinton Ebadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is this okay, and in case not, is there a better way to convert a
char* into a guile string?
SCM_API SCM scm_from_locale_string (const char *str);
SCM_API SCM scm_from_locale_stringn (const char *str, size_t len);
SCM_API SCM scm_tak
Bill Schottstaedt:
`scm_i_string_chars ()' is used by Mailutils, Lilypond, AutoGen, SND
I'm not knowingly using any scm_i_* entities in Snd. I removed the
scm_i_procedure_arity use, and I think the SCM_STRING_CHARS macro
is only used if it is defined.
Well, I'm using scm_i_string_chars i
"Neil Jerram":
> >>
> >> What exactly do you mean here? (My guess: that you compiled and ran
> >> the test program by hand, and that the exit status was 1 in each
> >> case?)
> >
> > Yes, that's what I meant.
>
> Thanks. So, do you agree that my interpretation of what _should_
> happen is corre
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
Ludovic Court?s:
> Therefore, being able to parse and access C code from Scheme/Guile
> itself,
> and handling such a code like any other Scheme object would clearly
> benefit the community opening many new p
Ludovic Court?s:
Therefore, being able to parse and access C code from Scheme/Guile itself,
and handling such a code like any other Scheme object would clearly
benefit the community opening many new possibilities.
For example, creating Guile bindings through a foreign function gener
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
Neil Jerram:
Luis Araujo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello everyone , how are you?
Hi Luis!
Thanks for posting this proposal. I haven't read every detail yet,
but have one initial query, and would be interested in
Neil Jerram:
Luis Araujo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello everyone , how are you?
Hi Luis!
Thanks for posting this proposal. I haven't read every detail yet,
but have one initial query, and would be interested in your thoughts.
It seems like it would be a big job to write a C parser in
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Andy Wingo wrote:
Hi Kjetil,
On Fri 11 Jan 2008 00:29, "Kjetil S. Matheussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This is my paper for the linux audio conference 2008:
http://www.notam02.no/~kjetism/sndrt_lac2008.pdf
Its a plain presentation of eval-c, snd-r
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Bill Schottstaedt wrote:
This is my paper for the linux audio conference 2008:
Very interesting! Can we include it in the Snd tarball?
Its okay by me.
I wonder what the history of Guile was -- I had not associated
it with Jaffer, but with Tom Lord. I'll have to
Hi,
This is my paper for the linux audio conference 2008:
http://www.notam02.no/~kjetism/sndrt_lac2008.pdf
Its a plain presentation of eval-c, snd-rt, san dysth and snd/pd,
plus a discussion about soft realtime in guile.
Clinton Ebadi:
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
You should probably also have a look at the Scheme-Level FFI of PLT
Scheme[1], and my reimplementation for Scheme 48[2].
Thanks f
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
(let ()
(display (defined? 'gakk))
(inject-variable gakk 90)
gakk)
=> #f90
By the way. I'm quite surprised the environments consist
of linked lists. Wouldn't it be much faster using hash
tables instead? Perhaps
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
(benchmark 20) in Guile:
Guile: 4.4mb / 277s / 149mb
Boehm: 4.4mb / 243s / 148mb
Unfortunately, that one was probably wrong. Here is the retest result with
the Boehm GC guile:
Boehm: 5.2mb / 380s / 164mb
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi,
"Kjetil S. Matheussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
libgc (v6.8) was compiled with the --enable-threads=posix only.
So `THREAD_LOCAL_ALLOC' was defined in your libgc build, right?
Yes: -DTHREAD_LOCAL_ALLOC=1
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Actually, I haven't used guile for other interactive stuff than
snd. And snd is huge. It could be that the boehm gc works a lot lot
better for really large programs than guile's gc. I'll try to run the
gc benchmark program inside snd (with lots of sch
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
The main thing that needs to be done before we can consider this
solution now is to compare both memory usage _and_ execution time of the
two Guiles.
Yes, but for some kinds of software, like programs with custom gui's, sound
proce
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi,
Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[2] tla my-default-archive [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tla get guile-core--boehm-gc
So that's the one you've been using and referring to as "Guile + Boehm
GC"? Glad to hear it! ;-)
Sorry
30 matches
Mail list logo
