On 01/09/2016 04:30 PM, Thompson, David wrote:
>
> I don't think Guix is a good fit here, because there's simply no way
> around the fact that Guix packages *must* contain the full dependency
> graph for build-time and runtime dependencies. There's no way that
> you could use, say, the Guile or GC
On 01/09/2016 03:35 PM, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
>
> Can you explain what a Guile specific fork of guix will bring over guix?
See the last part of this post.
>> User should be able to upload packages but each package should be
>> carefully reviewed (possibly by the community itself).
>
> This i
Package managers have been immensely successful in increasing the
popularity of programming languages - think about Perl's CPAN or Ruby's
Gem. But Guile doesn't a package manager, and that in my opinion slows
down its adoption.
The Guix repos distribute a lot of useful Guile libraries (like
guile-
On 01/09/2016 02:05 PM, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
> Héllo,
Hi!
> There is a package manager https://github.com/ijp/guildhall with a
> package
> repository with automatic package publishing without review.
There are many package managers actually, and most of them were
abandoned by their maintai
