Christina O'Donnell writes:
> On 09/01/2024 07:05, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> It’s a new year — any chance for one more look whether adding SRFI-119
>> in Guile is ok to merge?
>
> As a disclaimer, I'm a Scheme newbie, but I think my opinion may have /some/
> value.
> On its own, Wis
Hi Ricardo,
#; works in Guile.
Ah, that's my bad.
- Christina
Christina O'Donnell writes:
> Likewise, commenting code in scheme is a pain because code-commenting
> is done by
> line. R6RS comments (#;) aren't implemented in Guile to my knowledge. So
> parenthesis aware commenting is left up to the editor to implement.
#; works in Guile.
--
Ricardo
Hi Arne,
On 09/01/2024 07:05, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> It’s a new year — any chance for one more look whether adding SRFI-119
> in Guile is ok to merge?
As a disclaimer, I'm a Scheme newbie, but I think my opinion may have /some/
value.
On its own, Wisp seems like a better syntax for
Hi,
I just got the most beautiful feedback on Wisp as a Scheme primer, so I
would like to nag about inclusion of SRFI-119 into Guile again:
»I tend to use [Wisp] as a Scheme primer for colleagues that are used
to Python but want to explore the realms of functional programming
without … hav
