On Wed, 2023-11-29 at 07:54 +0100, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> I was under the impression that all code in Guile itself was assumed
> to always be byte-compiled (because of issues like the fact that trying
> to evaluate the evaluator would make you chase your own tail).
For installation probably yes,
Le mercredi 29 novembre 2023 à 07:47 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld a écrit :
> Sure: It makes sure that the extension is loaded also when not having a
> compiled custom-ports.go. For reference, see the documentation at
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Eval-When.html -
> the previously
On Tue, 2023-11-28 at 22:11 +0100, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le dimanche 29 octobre 2023 à 10:51 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld a écrit :
> > while playing with current Guile main on Windows, I found some problems
> > in the implementation of custom-ports that was recently committed.
> > Please consider the
The HACKING file says that we always have to go through FSF copyright
assignment beforehand, so I was just waiting for that. If they don't care about
that anymore, then my name would go in THANKS instead. For completeness, I've
attached patches for either case.
(In case I'm still wrong, this wo
Jonas Hahnfeld via "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library"
writes:
>> What do you and others think of this approach, would this be "more"
>> acceptable to land in main?
>
> Ping, any comments on this approach? I built binaries for LilyPond
> 2.25.10 using these patches applied
Le dimanche 29 octobre 2023 à 10:51 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld via Developers list
for Guile, the GNU extensibility library a écrit :
> while playing with current Guile main on Windows, I found some problems
> in the implementation of custom-ports that was recently committed.
> Please consider the attac
On Sun, 2023-10-29 at 22:34 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 20:50 +, Mike Gran wrote:
> > Hello Guile,
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I'm sorry for "necrobumping" this thread; I wanted to reply back in
> June but didn't have enough time to work through what I will explain
> further bel
On Wed, 2023-10-18 at 22:24 +0200, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> running autogen.sh produces a number of generated files that are
> currently not properly ignored or even checked into git. Please take a
> look at the attached patches and apply if suitable.
ping, any maintainer willing to take a
On Sun, 2023-10-29 at 10:51 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld via Developers list
for Guile, the GNU extensibility library wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while playing with current Guile main on Windows, I found some problems
> in the implementation of custom-ports that was recently committed.
> Please consider the attache
While the `.' might be correct from a grammatical point of view (I do
not know), it turns the example into invalid scheme code, which is not
ideal. New users (like me) might try to copy the whole line and wonder
why it does not work (like I did). So delete it.
* doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi (SRFI-1
Extend the documentation for (ice-9 match) module with explanations of
some of the patterns and also provide more examples for them. That
should make it more useful for people trying to use the module for the
first time just based on the documentation.
* doc/ref/match.texi (Pattern Matching): Exp
11 matches
Mail list logo
