Re: Hygienic rewrite of (ice-9 expect)

Hi Maxime, Apologies for the 3 month delay in the reply, but it took some time to until I managed to finish significant changes/rewrite to address your points. The new code is on the same branch, but rebased on current savannah master, and significantly different from the earlier. Please find my

Re: Replacing Guile test-suite with SRFI-64?

> Hi, > Would a rewrite of the Guile tests using SRFI-64 be a welcome idea? > IMO the advantages of doing so are: ... >Opinions? IMHO, I think Guile should not depend too heavily on Guile for testing itself. It is bad bootstrapping practice. And personally, I find that errors in srfi-64 tests

Replacing Guile test-suite with SRFI-64?

Hi, Would a rewrite of the Guile tests using SRFI-64 be a welcome idea? IMO the advantages of doing so are: * Less “specifics” that need to be learned solely for working with Guile. It's easier for people already using SRFI-64 to “bring in” their experience. * Standardized/portable. Straightforw