Re: pull requests for guile

2023-05-08 Thread Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
Josselin Poiret writes: > Reciprocally, I don't think a simple pull request provides much over > git-am, except that with `format-patch`, everything is simply text, that > once sent over email (in a decentralized fashion) can be simply > responded to and read without relying on complicated javas

Re: pull requests for guile

2023-05-08 Thread Arsen Arsenović
Hi Matt, Matt Wette writes: > Hi All, > > Does the savannah git repo support `git-request-pull'?   And if so, > would that make getting patches in more efficient?   It seems the guile > project needs a way to get simple fixed, at least, merged in.  Would > this help? git request-pull merely for

Re: pull requests for guile

2023-05-08 Thread Josselin Poiret
Hey Dmitry and Matt, First off, `git-request-pull` requires the user to have their own repository hosted somewhere, and someone would need to clone it/add a remote and fetch from it just to check out what's inside. That means extra steps with no real benefits. Dmitry Alexandrov writes: > The o

Re: pull requests for guile

2023-05-08 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
Matt Wette wrote: > Does the savannah git repo support `git-request-pull'? To the best of my knowledge, no any server-side support is required for that. Git is intentionally designed to avoid any reliance on servers as much as possible. > And if so, would that make getting patches in more effi

Re: (. wtf?)

2023-05-08 Thread tomas
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 01:53:31PM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: > wrote: > >> it is required for compatibility with elisp > > > > Is it Guile's incompatibility with Emacs Lisp > > As of now, they are compatible in that regard. > > > (no wonder: the first is a Scheme, the second a Lisp: they a

Re: (. wtf?)

2023-05-08 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
wrote: >> it is required for compatibility with elisp > > Is it Guile's incompatibility with Emacs Lisp As of now, they are compatible in that regard. > (no wonder: the first is a Scheme, the second a Lisp: they are related, but > pretty different) Yet, but if I am not mistaken, =scheme= and =

Re: (. wtf?)

2023-05-08 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" wrote: > If I understood it correctly Yes, thank you. > they Just to clarify: I have no claims to represent anyoneʼs view but my own. Having said that, the fact, that by writing a reader without keeping this very case in mind, you get _this_ behaviour (as @jann...@