On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 07:31:11AM +0200, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>
> writes:
>
> > You seem to be somewhat upset, but I don't quite understand what
> > your gripe is.
>
> If I understood it correctly, they interpret the 'wtf? as expressing
> "this is a problem that should be changed"
writes:
> You seem to be somewhat upset, but I don't quite understand what
> your gripe is.
If I understood it correctly, they interpret the 'wtf? as expressing
"this is a problem that should be changed" and wanted to say
(equal? '(. a) 'a) should stay #true in Guile and consequently
(call-with
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 09:06:21PM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
> On Fri, 05 May 2023 16:35 Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > (call-with-input-string "(. wtf?)" read)
> >
> > ⇒ wtf?
> >
> > #Guile #Scheme
>
> Hey!^W Sorry...
>
> Dear Guile developer,
>
> your tweet made me deeply concerned. Is it
Dmitry Alexandrov writes:
> but explicitly documented in (info "(elisp) Dotted Pair Notation") as well:
>
> #+begin_quote
>As a somewhat peculiar side effect of ‘(a b . c)’ and ‘(a . (b . c))’
> being equivalent, for consistency this means that if you replace ‘b’
> here with the empty sequen
On Fri, 05 May 2023 16:35 Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> (call-with-input-string "(. wtf?)" read)
>
> ⇒ wtf?
>
> #Guile #Scheme
Hey!^W Sorry...
Dear Guile developer,
your tweet made me deeply concerned. Is it a sign that this behaviour is going
to be ‘fixed’ eventually?
Besides actually being (im
http://wingolog.org/pub/fash.scm
--
Linus Björnstam
On Sat, 4 Mar 2023, at 12:22, Philip McGrath wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 4, 2023, at 5:28 AM, Linus Björnstam wrote:
>> Andy already has a fast implementation of functional hashtables
>> ("fash") which are of a particular high quality. They do not
