just for the fun things, i just find that the parallelized results are
false :-) even for low indices:
the non // result: C5 = ((B1 ∧ B3) ∨ (B2 ∧ B3) ∨ (B2 ∧ B4))
is different than the parallelized result below:
C5 = ((B1 ∧ B3) ∨ (B2 ∧ B3) ∨ (B2 ∧ B4) ∨ (B3 ∧ B4))
i have to check things again ,i t
Hi,
Csepp writes:
> I looked in the Guix sources to see how others do it and found mention
> of a possibly related bug:
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=52835
> Is that still relevant? Because debuggs is just, khm, great, I don't
> see any clear indication of what its status is.
after intense coding i finally got the good results,
my assumption about the global variable hash table was true ,it is
incompatible with 'future : the competition for the writing into the hash
table breaks the code.
If i do writing in hash table out of // region all is ok:
a simple function to e
