Re: help needed with stderr redirection

2022-10-21 Thread tomas
On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 01:29:05AM +0200, Csepp wrote: > I have this short snippet of code for a Guix related utility script and > for the love of the Glowcloud it does not want to work. I want to > filter stderr for certain lines and they are not being redirected. When > running the full script

help needed with stderr redirection

2022-10-21 Thread Csepp
I have this short snippet of code for a Guix related utility script and for the love of the Glowcloud it does not want to work. I want to filter stderr for certain lines and they are not being redirected. When running the full script from a shell, it correctly captures standard out, but all the w

Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Bindings to *at functions

2022-10-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Ludovic Courtès skribis: > I erroneously pushed a variant without copyright lines for yourself. If > you confirm that you are the copyright holder, I’ll just readd them as > you had done. Actually no, this is all fine. I guess I just need some rest. :-) Ludo’.

Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Bindings to *at functions

2022-10-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Ludovic Courtès skribis: > Maxime Devos skribis: > >> This is a v2 of >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2021-03/msg0026.html, >> with a lot more tests, a few less functions and more consistent >> documentation. >> ‘rename-file-at’ has been modified to support #f as one of t

Re: Packages depending on (guix build syscalls)

2022-10-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Oops, this was meant for guix-devel, apologies!

Re: Packages depending on (guix build syscalls)

2022-10-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Maxime Devos skribis: > Additionally, to me it looks like a few of the things in (guix build > syscalls) could be eventually moved in Guile itself, e.g. mktemp!, > fdatasync and setxattr, which could eventually reduce the need of > packages to import (guix build syscalls). Yes, we should de