On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 12:11:12PM -0700, Matt Wette wrote:
> maybe guile could consider regexp's in scheme
> see https://ds26gte.github.io/pregexp/index.html
This would have other advantages (e.g. suspendable match
off a port), right?
Cheers
- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
maybe guile could consider regexp's in scheme
see https://ds26gte.github.io/pregexp/index.html
On 9/2/21 8:45 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
Hi guilers!
My next project is to explore a more advanced bytevector structure
than today's bytevectors.
I think that having this infrastructure in
Hi guilers!
My next project is to explore a more advanced bytevector structure than
today's bytevectors.
I think that having this infrastructure in guile and core code taken
advantage of it like having strings otop of it and allowing our string
library to use those (the difficult case is probably
Oh I just created the project, you can follow it here:
https://gitlab.com/tampe/stis-supervectors
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 5:45 PM Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guilers!
>
> My next project is to explore a more advanced bytevector structure than
> today's bytevecto
Patch is applied in 1f100a4f20c3a6e57922fb26fce212997e2a03cb, thanks.
However I cannot build Guile on macos at the moment bc of an error in
lib/basename-lgpl.h, this seems caused by the last gnulib update :-\
> On 2 Sep 2021, at 07:38, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué wrote:
>
> Without this change dy
